
Birth isn’t a perfect film by any means. This was my third viewing of it – first time I hated it, second time I thought I got it, this time around I realized that I didn’t really get it the second time (I think I finally understand things). To call it ambiguous would be to put things lightly, but that’s part of the fascination here. Kidman plays a widow who is visited by a ten-year-old boy claiming to be her reincarnated dead husband. Emotional roller coaster rides ensue for everyone, including Kidman’s fiancée (played by Danny Huston).
I disagreed strongly on this one with my roommate, who really really REALLY hated the film. I don’t love it, but I would totally watch this again, because there’s a lot of really interesting stuff going on. The premise is interesting, the acting is superb across the board (a highly underrated performance from Kidman and solid work from Cameron Bright as her supposed husband), the cinematography is breathtakingly stark and gorgeous, and the score from Alexandre Desplat is brilliant.
There are missteps, to be sure: Bright isn’t directed particularly well by director Jonathan Glazer, I think, going for creepy-as-hell when I think the part warrants more ambiguity; there are weird sequences like a graphic sex scene that serves no purpose; the ultimate revelation of whether or not Bright is who he says he is gets muddled; and Anne Heche is underused in a role that should have been more prominently featured.
Still, the film is interesting and worth watching despite the flaws present. I caught this for six bucks on Amazon and I don’t regret buying it. It takes a couple of viewings to appreciate the film, I think, but once you do there’s a lot to glean from the finished product. A for ambition, B+ for execution.



